When I did my first experiments, several people told me not to publish the data. “Don’t give it away for free,” they told me. “Use it to make money!” I decided then that my main goal wasn’t to make money. I almost got tricked into paying $1,000 for clean air, and I wanted to help people avoid getting tricked too, so I published the data anyway.
Of course, publishing the instructions online has made it easy for people to copy the idea. The Huanwo Lantian (还我蓝天) was one of the first to follow in our footsteps, selling a DIY filter a few months back. They even use a screen capture of Smart Air co-founder Gus’s appearance on Chinese TV on their shop:
I was curious to see how their filter works, so I decided to order one off of Taobao and put it to the test.
Now I’m in an awkward position because I found that their HEPA was not working nearly as well as my Smart Air HEPAs. It’s awkward because, if I publish the data, will people think I’m just trying to attack a competitor?
In the end, I think it’s better to publish the results and be honest about my conflict of interest. At the very least, I think people have an interest in knowing how well other DIYs work–especially when some of those websites use graphs that are lifted from my site, which can mislead people into thinking the test results are from their machines.
And as always, I’m publishing my raw data and testing methods at the end of this post, so fellow nerds can replicate my studies.
DIY Purifier Test Method
My collaborator Anna used the same methods as our earlier tests in her 15m2 room. Anna did five overnight tests with the same Dylos Pro particle counter, and I calculated effectiveness as the percent reduction of particles in the room air, averaging the last three hours (more info). Then I compared the results to my earlier tests in the same room.
Imitation DIY Purifier Results
The Huanwo Lantian DIY removed 21% fewer particles 0.5 microns and above and 11% less 2.5 micron particles than the Original DIY.
Is It The Fan?
The Huanwo Lantian fan is slightly smaller than the Smart Air Original, so one explanation could be that the fan is just moving less air. Anna tested that by strapping the Huanwo Lantian HEPA onto our Original fan.
Here’s what that test showed.
There wasn’t much difference. With the new fan, it was getting 4% more 0.5 micron particles and 2% less 2.5 micron particles. Thus, the fan doesn’t seem to be the reason.
Is It The HEPA Filter?
The second possibility is that the Huanwo Lantian HEPA isn’t as good. Anna tested the HEPA by doing air outlet tests with a Met One GT-521, which measures down to 0.3 microns. Anna tested the air coming out of the HEPA for 10 seconds, and I averaged the results from three tests. (More details at the end of the post.)
The Huanwo Lantian HEPA captured 7% fewer particles that the Smart Air HEPA. Thus, the major source of the poor performance of the Huanwo Lantian seems to be the quality of the filter.
In room tests, the Huanwo Lantian DIY removes 21% less particulate than the Original DIY, and the data suggests that the reason is that it uses a lower quality HEPA filter.
Now, don’t get me wrong. The Huanwo Lantian DIY purifier is making the room air cleaner. It demonstrates yet again that DIY air purifiers work. I’d rather have a Huanwo Lantian than nothing. But the results show that this DIY copycat is cutting corners by using cheap HEPAs.
As always, I’m posting the raw data and more detail on the methods for fellow nerds.
For the methodology of the overnight room tests, see my earlier post. Anna ran five tests of the Huanwo Lantian DIY and six tests of the Huanwo Lantian HEPA + Original fan. The raw data is below.
Particle Counter: For the HEPA tests, I used a Met One GT-521 graciously donated by David Helman from HEPA China. The GT-521 has two advantages over the Dylos:
- The Met One gives counts for particles 0.3 microns and above, which is important for HEPA tests because 0.3 microns is the particle size that is hardest for HEPAs to capture.
- The Met One uses a pump, which is better for regulating air flow than the fan in the Dylos. I think the fan is adequate for most tests, but pumps help keep a steady air flow when the particle counter is in a stream of quickly moving air (which is what happens during HEPA tests).
Cumulative numbers: All of the particle counters I’ve used display the current number of particles, but the GT-521 displays the cumulative number of particles, so the numbers keep increasing, even if the room air is getting cleaner.
To deal with that, I divided the cumulative number of particles by the number of seconds in the test.
Baseline: To get a baseline number, Anna held the particle counter about a foot away from the purifier while the purifier was off. Anna ran the particle counter for 10 seconds and divided the cumulative number of particles by 10.
Timing: The particle counter starts immediately after hitting the start button, but starting the test right away is a bad idea because we want to avoid moving during the test. Therefore, Anna hit start, moved the counter so that the inlet was about half an inch from the center of the HEPA, and then waited until the particle counter collected a fresh 10 seconds of data.
Anna set the particle counter to collect data for 10 seconds, pause for 10 seconds, and then collect data for another 10 seconds. Anna used the latter 10 seconds so that we could avoid the effect of moving the particle counter into place.
Calculation: Anna repeated all of these steps three times for each HEPA, and I averaged the results of the three tests.
Room Test Raw Data
My earlier posts have the raw data for the Original (0.5 microns and 2.5 microns) and the Cannon. I’m posting the raw data for the 还我蓝天 and the 还我蓝天 + Original fan here.
Here is the raw data for the Huanwo Lantian plus Original fan:
Fluctuations in Outdoor Air Pollution
The outdoor air seemed to fluctuate more widely in these tests than during most of my earlier tests. So to test for the effect of outdoor air fluctuations, I analyzed days where the outdoor air was above the WHO limit (25 micrograms) and didn’t fluctuate more than 15 micrograms. Data from 3/16 met those criteria, starting at 149 micrograms and fluctuating a maximum of 6 micrograms.
On that day, the 还我蓝天 removed 66% on 0.5 microns and 77% of 2.5 microns. That’s within 2% of the overall average of 67% and 79%.
I’ve had similar conclusions when I did this type of analysis in my previous tests: changes in outdoor air pollution can strongly affect data on any single day, but averaging the data over multiple days leads to surprisingly robust estimates.
HEPA Test Raw Data
Free Guide to Breathing Safe
Want to learn more about protecting your health? Join thousands more and stay up to date on protecting your health.