{"id":392,"date":"2015-02-01T07:31:47","date_gmt":"2015-01-31T23:31:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/smartairfilters.com\/cn\/?p=392"},"modified":"2020-07-15T11:55:40","modified_gmt":"2020-07-15T03:55:40","slug":"is-a-30rmb-hepa-reliable","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/smartairfilters.com\/en\/blog\/is-a-30rmb-hepa-reliable\/","title":{"rendered":"Is a 30 RMB HEPA Reliable?"},"content":{"rendered":"

After I published\u00a0directions for how to make your own purifier<\/a>, people asked me: \u201cWhich HEPAs should I use? Is this one trustworthy?\u201d<\/p>\n

That\u2019s the type of question that makes a nerd like me happy because it means we need to get more data. So I ordered HEPAs from every manufacturer I could find, and I tested them all. After all the testing was done, I found I could ship the HEPAs that worked best for 80 RMB, which was cheaper than\u00a0the 110 RMB HEPAs I was buying<\/a>\u2013quality and price!<\/p>\n

Can HEPAs be even Cheaper?\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Later I found HEPAs for 20 RMB wholesale. I was excited. If HEPAs are that cheap, we can make the DIY even cheaper!<\/p>\n

But the test data was terrible. These HEPAs weren\u2019t anywhere close to getting 99% of particles, so I passed on them. If didn\u2019t want to use it in my home, why would I want to ship them to other people?<\/p>\n

A 99.97% HEPA for 30 RMB?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Thus I wasn\u2019t surprised a couple weeks ago when I saw a store on Taobao selling HEPAs for 30 RMB and claiming that my HEPAs are \u66b4\u5229 (aggressively overpriced). They claim that their HEPAs get 99.97% of particles, and if that\u2019s true, maybe these were the holy grail of HEPAs I was looking for all along!<\/p>\n

So I ordered two online and put them to the test. The first shock was seeing that it doesn\u2019t have a frame:<\/p>\n

\"1\"<\/p>\n

That makes it harder retain its shape, but it might still be effective without a frame, so I put it through the tests.<\/p>\n

Air Outlet Test<\/strong><\/p>\n

First, I tested it by putting it on\u00a0the Cannon<\/a>\u00a0and testing the air coming out of the HEPA with a\u00a0Met One Aerocet 531S<\/a>. (The Met One is useful because it has a pump to regulate airflow. In air outlet tests, the particle counter is sitting in a stream of air, so using a pump maintains constant readings.)<\/p>\n

\"2\"<\/p>\n

The results weren\u2019t pretty. Smart Air HEPAs got over 99.9% of particles, but the 30 RMB HEPA was below 90%\u2013far below their claim of 99.97%.<\/p>\n

Air Speed<\/strong><\/p>\n

But particle effectiveness isn\u2019t everything. A HEPA in the 80% range\u00a0might<\/strong>\u00a0work better if it has better air flow. In that case, maybe the HEPA could process the air more times and clean the room air as well as a real HEPA.<\/p>\n

To test that possibility, I\u00a0put each HEPA on the Cannon and\u00a0used a tool to measure air speed (fancy name \u201canemometer<\/a>\u201d). I placed the anemometer on the HEPA at four locations (left, right, top, bottom) and took the average air speed.<\/p>\n

\"3\"<\/p>\n

Again, the results weren\u2019t pretty. So not only was the 30 RMB HEPA getting far fewer particles, it was letting much less air through.<\/p>\n

Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n

Quality HEPAs for 30 RMB are still a dream. They\u2019re not useless, but using this 30 RMB HEPA would expose people to significantly more particles.<\/p>\n

I still hold out hope that manufacturers will be able to innovate cheaper HEPAs without sacrificing quality, but I haven\u2019t seen those HEPAs yet.<\/p>\n

Is the Taobao Store Owner Being Dishonest?\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

The 30 RMB HEPA store makes claims that their HEPAs get 99.97% of particles, and the data clearly contradicts that, so it\u2019s tempting to think that they\u2019re lying.<\/p>\n

But are they? I don\u2019t know what\u2019s in their mind, but my guess is that they simply didn\u2019t go through the hassle of buying a particle counter and testing the HEPAs. I suspect that half of what seems like dishonesty on Taobao is actually just sloppiness.<\/p>\n

As usual, I\u2019m posting the raw data below.<\/p>\n

Air Outlet Test<\/strong><\/p>\n

For the air outlet test, I used the\u00a0Met One Aerocet 531S<\/a>. Similar to my test of another sub-par imitation DIY<\/a>, I took readings of the air at the inlet as a baseline, then sampled air coming out of the HEPA for one minute. I tested the HEPAs on the Cannon<\/a> on its high setting.<\/p>\n

The Met One measures particles .5 microns and above. Ideally the test should use a particle counter that measures down to .3 microns because that is the hardest particle size for HEPAs to capture<\/a>. However, I am still in the process of getting a particle counter that measures to .3 microns (they\u2019re not cheap!).\u00a0But given the fact that .5 microns is a slightly lower bar, it\u2019s hard to imagine that the 30 RMB HEPA would score better on even smaller particles.<\/p>\n

I used the particle count mode rather than the microgram-estimation mode. Micrograms are far too coarse to detect differences between HEPAs. Microgram modes will often read zero even when placed in front of a poor-quality HEPA.<\/p>\n

Does that mean microgram particle counters are wrong? Not quite. A reading of zero micrograms does NOT mean the machine has detected zero particles. If you switch it to particle count mode, you\u2019ll see that the machine is still detecting plenty of particles. It reads zero micrograms because the algorithm it\u2019s using to convert to micrograms is below the threshold for micrograms.<\/p>\n

Here is the raw data for the air outlet test:<\/p>\n

\"4\"<\/p>\n

Air Speed Test<\/strong><\/p>\n

In the air speed test, I placed the HEPAs on\u00a0the Cannon<\/a>\u00a0on its high setting. I put the anemometer directly on the HEPA and let it remain until the reading was stable (about 15-30 seconds). I oriented the Cannon as horizontally as possible (air speed readings are slightly lower if the Cannon is pointed directly up).<\/p>\n

I tested the lower left, lower right, upper left, and upper right. Then I averaged the values. There are slight variations in air speed between the different areas of the HEPA.<\/p>\n

\"data\"<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

After I published\u00a0directions for how to make your own purifier, people asked me: \u201cWhich HEPAs should I use? Is this one trustworthy?\u201d That\u2019s the type of question that makes a nerd like me happy because it means we need to get more data. So I ordered HEPAs from every manufacturer … <\/p>\n

Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1035,"featured_media":3549,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_relevanssi_hide_post":"","_relevanssi_hide_content":"","_relevanssi_pin_for_all":"","_relevanssi_pin_keywords":"","_relevanssi_unpin_keywords":"","_relevanssi_related_keywords":"","_relevanssi_related_include_ids":"","_relevanssi_related_exclude_ids":"","_relevanssi_related_no_append":"","_relevanssi_related_not_related":"","_relevanssi_related_posts":"","_relevanssi_noindex_reason":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[259,262],"tags":[133],"class_list":["post-392","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-filters","category-reviews","tag-imitator-test","resize-featured-image"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/smartairfilters.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/392","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/smartairfilters.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/smartairfilters.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/smartairfilters.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1035"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/smartairfilters.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=392"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/smartairfilters.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/392\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3937,"href":"https:\/\/smartairfilters.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/392\/revisions\/3937"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/smartairfilters.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3549"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/smartairfilters.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=392"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/smartairfilters.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=392"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/smartairfilters.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=392"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}