{"id":519,"date":"2019-01-15T09:16:15","date_gmt":"2019-01-15T09:16:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/smartairfilters.com\/mn\/?p=519"},"modified":"2019-06-30T14:05:44","modified_gmt":"2019-06-30T14:05:44","slug":"cadr-different-from-airflow","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/smartairfilters.com\/mn\/en\/blog\/cadr-different-from-airflow\/","title":{"rendered":"What\u2019s CADR and how is it different from airflow?"},"content":{"rendered":"

When buying a purifier, you\u2019ll sometimes see companies use the word \u201cairflow\u201d (\u98ce\u91cf) to describe an air purifier\u2019s performance and other companies the word CADR (clean air delivery rate) as seen in the picture below.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

They\u2019re both a measure of purifier performance, but are they the same thing? Can I compare one purifier\u2019s CADR value with another purifier\u2019s airflow value?<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Short Answer<\/h3>\n

No. CADR and airflow are not the same thing. If you see somebody claiming they have the same CADR and airflow (like the screenshots attached below), you know something is up!<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Long Answer<\/h3>\n

The real answer gets into some nerdy (but actually profound) details about how people measure CADR and airflow.<\/p>\n

Here\u2019s what you need to do for a CADR test:<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

(For total nerds,\u00a0<\/span>the government guidelines describe the full methods<\/a>\u00a0[in Chinese])<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

How People Test CADR<\/h3>\n

Step 1:\u00a0<\/span><\/strong>Pollute a sealed room to crazy high pollution levels (normally by lighting cigarettes).<\/p>\n

Step 2:\u00a0<\/span><\/strong>Run your purifier.<\/p>\n

Step 3:<\/strong>\u00a0<\/span>Take PM2.5 concentration readings every 2 minutes for 20 minutes.<\/p>\n

Step 4:<\/strong>\u00a0<\/span>Use these numbers to work out the rate of purification of the room (the CADR).<\/p>\n

The hard part about doing this test is that you need a lot of complex equipment, a large testing room, the time and patience to do the test, and some data analysis skills.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

How People Test Airflow<\/h3>\n

To measure airflow, the only thing you need is a wind speed measure (fancy name \u201canemometer\u201d):<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

How to Test Wind Speed<\/h3>\n

Step 1:<\/strong>\u00a0<\/span>Place the anemometer against the filter and look at the number.<\/p>\n

Step 2:<\/strong>\u00a0<\/span>Multiply this speed by the area of your filter.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s it! So much easier.<\/p>\n

This method works all right, but it has a problem. Since this method only measures wind speed, it only tells us how much air is coming out.<\/p>\n

What doesn\u2019t it tell us?<\/h3>\n
    \n
  1. How clean is that air coming out?<\/li>\n
  2. Is any of that air actually coming in from a leak or the middle of the air vortex and then being pushed back out?<\/li>\n
  3. How efficiently is the machine mixing that air in the room?<\/li>\n
  4. How much of the air that comes out of the purifier gets sucked back into the machine quickly, rather than being pushed farther out into the room?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Air flow tests assume perfect values for all of these variables. For example, it assumes that all the air coming out is 100% clean. Because all the assumptions are rosy, air flow values tend to be much more impressive than CADR.<\/p>\n

    Bottom line:\u00a0<\/span><\/strong>Air flow is less rigorous than CADR and will almost always be much higher than CADR. Do not directly compare the two numbers.<\/p>\n

    Couldn\u2019t We Convert Airflow into CADR?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

    The nerd in me thought that if we just multiply the airflow with the efficiency of the filter (for example, our filters capture 99.9% of particles above and below 0.3 microns), then we can measure the amount of clean air coming of the filter. But this still leaves out one vital bit of information:\u00a0<\/span>this doesn\u2019t consider real life conditions on how air recirculates and mixes in a room.<\/strong><\/p>\n

    When you measure airflow, you\u2019re assuming all the air passes the filter just once. This doesn\u2019t happen in real life, and predicts higher effectiveness than happens in real-world tests. The air in a real room is constantly being mixed (like stirring sugar into our morning coffee), which means that already purified air will recirculate and pass through the purifier for second or even third time. Re-purifying already purified air is not optimal, but it is inevitable. And that leads to a lower than expected cleaning rate.<\/p>\n

    This explains why CADR values are lower than airflow values, and shows that comparing one purifier\u2019s CADR with another purifier\u2019s airflow value just won\u2019t cut it.<\/p>\n

    How Much Lower Is CADR Than Airflow?<\/h3>\n

    At Smart Air, we use airflow and CADR tests when testing purifiers like the\u00a0<\/span>Blast purifiers we just released<\/a>. We use both because they both have advantages (airflow tests give a quick rough estimate of a purifier\u2019s effectiveness; CADR is more precise). Because we do both types of tests, we can see how much smaller CADR values are on average.<\/span><\/p>\n

    \"\"<\/p>\n

     <\/p>\n

    Average across many different purifiers we\u2019ve tested, we found that CADR tends to be around 60% of airflow results.<\/p>\n

     <\/p>\n

    How to choose:\u00a0<\/span><\/strong>When comparing purifiers, look for CADR over airflow (and pay attention to whether the company is reporting one or the other). And keep in mind that CADR tests are often done by third-party testing companies, whereas airflow is typically measured by the purifier manufacturer.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    When buying a purifier, you\u2019ll sometimes see companies use the word \u201cairflow\u201d (\u98ce\u91cf) to describe an air purifier\u2019s performance and other companies the word CADR (clean air delivery rate) as seen in the picture below.     They\u2019re both a measure of purifier performance, but are they the same thing? … Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4580,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-519","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/smartairfilters.com\/mn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/519","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/smartairfilters.com\/mn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/smartairfilters.com\/mn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/smartairfilters.com\/mn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4580"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/smartairfilters.com\/mn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=519"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/smartairfilters.com\/mn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/519\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":713,"href":"https:\/\/smartairfilters.com\/mn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/519\/revisions\/713"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/smartairfilters.com\/mn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=519"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/smartairfilters.com\/mn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=519"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/smartairfilters.com\/mn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=519"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}