Are All DIYs the Same? Poor Results from 还我蓝天

When I did my first experiments, several people told me not to publish the data. “Don’t give it away for free,” they told me. “Use it to make money!” I decided then that my main goal wasn’t to make money. I almost got tricked into paying $1,000 for clean air, and I wanted to help people avoid getting tricked too, so I published the data anyway.


Of course, publishing the instructions online has made it easy for people to copy the idea. 还我蓝天 (Huanwo Lantian) was one of the first to follow in our footsteps, selling a DIY filter a few months back. They even use a screen capture of Gus’s appearance on Chinese TV on their shop:




I was curious to see how their filter works, so I decided to order one off of Taobao and put it to the test.


Now I’m in an awkward position because I found that their HEPA was not working nearly as well as my Smart Air HEPAs. It’s awkward because, if I publish the data, will people think I’m just trying to attack a competitor?


In the end, I think it’s better to publish the results and be honest about my conflict of interest. At the very least, I think people have an interest in knowing how well other DIYs work–especially when some of those websites use graphs that are lifted from my site, which can mislead people into thinking the test results are from their machines.


And as always, I’m publishing my raw data and testing methods at the end of this post, so fellow nerds can replicate my studies.


Method: My collaborator Anna used the same methods as our earlier tests in her 15m2 room. Anna did five overnight tests with the same Dylos Pro particle counter, and I calculated effectiveness as the percent reduction of particles in the room air, averaging the last three hours (more info). Then I compared the results to my earlier tests in the same room.


Here’s what I found:



Results: The 还我蓝天 DIY removed 21% fewer particles 0.5 microns and above and 11% less 2.5 micron particles than the Original.

Is it the fan? The 还我蓝天 fan is slightly smaller than the Smart Air Original, so one explanation could be that the 还我蓝天 fan is just moving less air. Anna tested that by strapping the 还我蓝天 HEPA onto our Original fan.


Here’s what I found:



Result: There wasn’t much difference. With the new fan, it was getting 4% more 0.5 micron particles and 2% less 2.5 micron particles. Thus, the fan doesn’t seem to be the reason.

Is it the HEPA? The second possibility is that the 还我蓝天 HEPA isn’t as good. Anna tested the HEPA by doing air outlet tests with a Met One GT-521, which measures down to 0.3 microns. Anna tested the air coming out of the HEPA for 10 seconds, and I averaged the results from three tests. (More details at the end of the post.)


Here’s what I found:



Results: The 还我蓝天 HEPA performed worse, about 7% lower than the HEPA standard. The major source of the 还我蓝天’s poor performance seems to be the quality of the filter.

Conclusion: In room tests, the 还我蓝天 DIY removes about 21% fewer particles than the Original DIY, and the data suggests that the reason is that 还我蓝天 HEPA is lower quality.


Now, don’t get me wrong. The 还我蓝天 DIY is making the room air cleaner. I’d rather have a 还我蓝天 than nothing. But the results show that this DIY copycat is cutting corners by using cheap HEPAs.

As always, I’m posting the raw data and more detail on the methods for fellow nerds.


Room Tests

For the methodology of the overnight room tests, see my earlier post. Anna ran five tests of the 还我蓝天 DIY and six tests of the 还我蓝天 HEPA + Original fan. The raw data is below.


HEPA Tests

Particle Counter: For the HEPA tests, I used a Met One GT-521 graciously donated by David Helman from HEPA China. The GT-521 has two advantages over the Dylos:

  1. The Met One gives counts for particles 0.3 microns and above, which is important for HEPA tests because 0.3 microns is the particle size that is hardest for HEPAs to capture.
  2. The Met One uses a pump, which is better for regulating air flow than the fan in the Dylos. I think the fan is adequate for most tests, but pumps help keep a steady air flow when the particle counter is in a stream of quickly moving air (which is what happens during HEPA tests).


Cumulative numbers: All of the particle counters I’ve used display the current number of particles, but the GT-521 displays the cumulative number of particles, so the numbers keep increasing, even if the room air is getting cleaner.


To deal with that, I divided the cumulative number of particles by the number of seconds in the test.


Baseline: To get a baseline number, Anna held the particle counter about a foot away from the purifier while the purifier was off. Anna ran the particle counter for 10 seconds and divided the cumulative number of particles by 10.


Timing: The particle counter starts immediately after hitting the start button, but starting the test right away is a bad idea because we want to avoid moving during the test. Therefore, Anna hit start, moved the counter so that the inlet was about half an inch from the center of the HEPA, and then waited until the particle counter collected a fresh 10 seconds of data.


Anna set the particle counter to collect data for 10 seconds, pause for 10 seconds, and then collect data for another 10 seconds. Anna used the latter 10 seconds so that we could avoid the effect of moving the particle counter into place.


Calculation: Anna repeated all of these steps three times for each HEPA, and I averaged the results of the three tests.


Room Test Raw Data

My earlier posts have the raw data for the Original (0.5 microns and 2.5 microns) and the Cannon. I’m posting the raw data for the 还我蓝天 and the 还我蓝天 + Original fan here.






Here is the raw data for the 还我蓝天 plus Original fan:


图片 1




Fluctuations in Outdoor Air Pollution

The outdoor air seemed to fluctuate more widely in these tests than during most of my earlier tests. So to test for the effect of outdoor air fluctuations, I analyzed days where the outdoor air was above the WHO limit (25 micrograms) and didn’t fluctuate more than 15 micrograms. Data from 3/16 met those criteria, starting at 149 micrograms and fluctuating a maximum of 6 micrograms.


On that day, the 还我蓝天 removed 66% on 0.5 microns and 77% of 2.5 microns. That’s within 2% of the overall average of 67% and 79%.


I’ve had similar conclusions when I did this type of analysis in my previous tests: changes in outdoor air pollution can strongly affect data on any single day, but averaging the data over multiple days leads to surprisingly robust estimates.


HEPA Test Raw Data


Covid19 coronavirus best masks materials fundraiser

Get the latest clean air tips!

Get updates on masks, air purifiers and air quality delivered straight to your inbox.

Leave a Reply

Notify of
Daniel Diep

So the difference in performance between the Smart Air and the copycat is the quality of the HEPA filter.

How would a consumer judge the quality of a HEPA filter before buying?


Good question Daniel, and that’s a tough one! Even after you’ve bought, unless you spend a few hundred dollars on an air pollution monitor, it’s still going to be difficult to know if the filter you’ve got is the best performer. The best tool you have before buying is data: check if there’s either open data from the manufacturer itself, or from a third party testing lab as a good guide to the performance of the filter. Other than this, you could ask to see a picture of the HEPA filter to check its build quality. It’s not a definitive… Read more »

Aedon Cassiel

Hi, what is the cost of the replacement filters for the Smart Air fans? If I want to purchase from you but then skip the shipping costs for replacement filters down the line, could I do that? If so, where would I find the right filter? I ask because this post obviously highlights the importance of getting the choice of filter right.

Great questions Aedon! You can find all the replacement filters on the filters page in the Smart Air shop. A great way to save on shipping is to do as you say – pick up more filters when you first buy the fan! Check out the ‘1 year pack’ options for the DIY and Cannon air purifiers!

Aedon Cassiel

Oh, interesting. I was asking about purchasing replacements somewhere else to escape the shipping costs, but I see now that the shipping is much less for the filters than it is for the Blasts (the model I’m looking at). The Blast would be half the cost of the best domestic model I could find (Coway Mighty) if not for the shipping—which puts it about even with the Coway in price per area of coverage except for the fact that I can get 3 blasts and put them in different locations for the price of 1 Coway unit. What do you… Read more »

Aedon Cassiel

Sorry if this comes off pushy, but I think the question I’m waiting for an answer to might get lost in that comment, and it looks like I don’t have any way to edit it. T

his is the last thing I’m looking for an answer to before I make a final decision about purifiers, so I’m going to try asking again to make sure I don’t end up refreshing the page waiting and never get an answer.

How do we equip the Blast with a charcoal filter? Thank you