When a billion people in China (and quite a few expats) woke up to the severe air pollution in almost every city in China, it forced a billion people to become experts in a complicated scientific question: Do masks work?
Since then, I’ve given talks with hundreds of people all around China about how to protect themselves from air pollution. In those talks, I’ve heard doubts from smart, skeptical people. Here I’ll answer those doubts because, fortunately, smart, skeptical scientists (plus one dedicated nerd—yours truly) have empirically tested these questions.
Update: for air-breathers in India, we did new tests with some of the most common masks available in India, including kids’ masks!
1. “There’s no way they capture the really small particles.”
The skeptic case:
The most dangerous particles are the smallest particles, but masks are so thin. How could they possibly get the smallest particles?
The scientific test:
Researchers from the University of Edinburgh tested different common masks by running a diesel generator (to mimic car exhaust) and piping the exhaust through different masks. They used a particle counter to see how many particles made it through the mask. Here’s my super scientific rendering of the setup:
One important detail: the particle counter they used measures down to .007 microns. We’re talking about truly tiny particles here!
First they tried a simple cotton handkerchief. Sometimes I see bikers in China wearing these.
Not great, 28% of particles blocked.
Next they tried a cheap surgical mask.
Surprisingly good! (Fit tests generally show lower results–see below–but still a lot higher than most people’s intuition.)
Next they tried several bike masks.
Most were around 80%.
Then they tried several cheap 3M masks.
They all scored over 95%. Pretty good!
Conclusion: Masks capture even very small particles.
2. “OK, they capture the small particles, but when you wear them, all the air just leaks in the side.”
The skeptic case:
Masks work in theory, but those tests aren’t on real faces! When you actually wear them, you can’t get a good enough fit, so they’re basically useless.
The scientific test:
This question is tougher to answer because you have to measure the mask while you’reactually wearing it. For that, you need a really expensive fit test machine. Fortunately, I begged and begged 3M until they let me use their lab in Beijing:
The blue tube is sampling air outside the mask, while the white tube is sampling air from inside the mask (more details on the methods here ).
Smart Air co-founder Anna Guo and Beijing-based Dr. Richard Saint Cyr also tested masks, so I combined all of our data. Here’s how well the masks worked on our faces:
The 3M masks consistently performed the best in these tests. The Vogmask performed fairly well, capturing 95% of pollutants. Big-name masks like the Respro and Totobobo masks both captured less than 85% of pollutants.
How well do masks work for the broader population?
It’s important to make clear: masks that fit my face well might not fit other people’s faces well. However, there is evidence from a broader population that masks fit most people well. A scientific study of 3M models on 22 Chinese people found a median fit score of 99.5%–essentially the same as the top results from Dr. Saint Cyr and me.
Best yet, effective masks don’t cost a lot of money.
The branded masks – Vogmask, Respro, I Can Breathe and Totobobo – all cost the most. However these masks consistently performed worse than cheaper 3M masks. Only the Vogmask was able to capture over 95% of particulates (meeting the N95 criteria).
Exception: Gas Pollutants
Respirators are great, but note that these are tests on particulate pollution (such as PM2.5). Most commercially available masks don’t target gas pollutants like NO2 and O3, so masks are not giving 100% protection.
3. Is there a documented health benefit of wearing a mask?
This is probably the hardest question to answer. However, there are two solid studies that have randomly assigned people in Beijing to wear masks or not and measured their heart rate and blood pressure (1 , 2).
While wearing masks, people had lower blood pressure and better-regulated heart rates.