To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
TO CALCULATE THE NUMBER OF RE-BREATHED BREATHS PER HOUR take the CO2 level, subtract 400, and then d… 阅读更多 »
A suggestion for any CO2 monitor manufacturers reading this: Why don’t you add a “Percen… 阅读更多 »
Some of these CO2 monitors also seem to measure PM2.5, have any tests been done on their PM2.5 accuracy? For example. the DM1307 looks like it may be a good option for something that is very accurate for CO2, and if it also measures PM2.5 accurately, then a good value compared to the PM2.5 list against PurpleAir and such.
Also– PurpleAir claims to detect down to 0.3 micron, what are your thoughts on whether that would help directly detect possible viral levels?
Otherwise, great stuff on the blog posts! Just wish you had more affordable shipping to North America!
I’ve ordered the cheapest listed Tyler, to supplement my Aranet4 – it apparently now comes with a 2Ah battery. Hopefully replaceable!
Of interest CO2 at around 420ppm would appear generally heavier than air (0.038%) – unless the air itself was particularly ‘heavy’ (humid)?
By the way, the device you have pictured as a “SA1200P” is not the actual device model.
It’s manufacturered by someone in china and resold/rebranded under dozens of different names.
It was my first CO2 meter! It’s not bad. But I’m fairly confident it’s not 98% accurate. I suspect it’s a problem of temperature compensation, but I saw mine read 380 once outdoors.